Showing posts with label Something Else. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Something Else. Show all posts

07 January 2011

Post 286: something else

A Diatribe Against the Sanitizing, Political Correction, or Otherwise Censoring  of Books
So, I debated about whether or not I was going to write this or not, but then I decided that this is a good issue for a librarian/historian to tackle, and maybe not everyone has heard the news.  A couple of days ago, I found out that NewSouth Books has decided to remove the word "nigger" from Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer and replace it with the "less offensive" slave and servant.

Let me just start by saying that one of the reasons I did not like reading those books was because that word was so pervasive.  However, removing the word doesn't remove the atrocities that occurred or erase racism.  All it does is try to hide the ugliness under a rug; but then look at the publishing company.  I am in no way surprised or shocked that a company based in Montgomery, Alabama and Louisville, Kentucky are trying to whitewash the two novels that are in many ways the only experience Northerners have with The South.  I just want to say, if you want to remove the word "nigger" from anything, how about starting with the mouths of your high schoolers?  I can't tell you how many times I heard that word bandied about by the Good Ol' Boys who for some reason thought I was a big ol' Yank and ought to go home, despite the fact that the Civil War has been over for nearly 150 years now.  

And if you think the word "nigger" is so offensive, then why for the love of god did we "celebrate" Robert E. Lee day on the same day as Martin Luther King day?  Might that not be considered just a little insensitive given what each was fighting for?  That's about as thoughtful as giving someone with lactose intolerance a cheesecake for their birthday.  I'm not against celebrating Southern history, there is definitely some benefit in studying it and even celebrating the fact that most of the negative stuff is over, at least in the legal sense.  I am all for having a "Thank god, we don't enslave men, women, and children just because they happened to have dark skin" day.  This would be a great thing to celebrate.  There ought to be freakin' hoe downs and dancing by the glow of the bonfire and spiritual orgies of the joyous celebration of freedom.  But revering a hero of the South without recognizing that maybe he was just a little fucked up is disregarding a major fact of history and completely defeats the purpose of studying it all together.

The fact that NewSouth is removing this word from the text is an awful lot like denying a part of history.  In essence, they are no better than the people who denied that the Holocaust ever happened, despite the evidence of survivors, documentation by the Nazis, and the physical camps themselves.  And the reason that Huck Finn is such a powerful book is the friendship between Huck and Jim, despite the fact that everyone else thinks that Jim is an inferior person.  By removing the word "nigger" from the text, we are essentially neutering Huck Finn and removing the potency of the development of that relationship.  In this way, the relationship becomes more about overcoming class than racism and you might as well just turn Jim into an uneducated white farmer.  In the end, the word "nigger" is important to the story and taking it out changes the meaning, making it a different book, and Mark Twain's name ought to be removed.  I highly doubt he would want to be associated with this abomination, and you can bet if he were still alive he'd be working on a hell of a letter to the editor right now.

In response to Alan Gribben's reasoning behind this decision
I understand that you want this work to continue being taught.  I agree that it is extremely distressing that it is being removed from the classroom simply because it contains this particular word.  However, this is not the solution.  The problem is that there are people out there who not only wish to parent their own children, but have taken it upon themselves to prevent other people's children from being exposed to ideas or words they disagree with.  

In the introduction to this work, which is thankfully available for free online, Gribben states, "Consequently in this edition I have translated each usage of the n-word to read 'slave' instead, since the term 'slave' is closest in meaning and implication."  No.  The term slave is not inherently negative in all cultures nor an indication of a necessarily inferior class of people.  Nigger does not equal slave, because a slave can still be seen as a person, one who was subjugated into this brand of servitude regardless of their innate worth or intelligence.  "Niggers" were seen as being inherently inferior and undeserving of respect of body, mind, soul, or family relations.  If you wanted to replace the word nigger, it ought to have been with something that held the same connotations of inferiority and worthlessness that most people in the South showed black Americans at that time; slave just doesn't quite do it.

And now a word from someone else on the matter:

31 December 2010

Meme: My Life in Books and some Statistics

I don't normally participate in memes, but I liked this one and I figured people might just be interested in some stats...so that'll follow too.  Oh yeah, this was ganked from Lizzy's Literary Life.  Some of the books on the list may not be from the blog, because I started it in March, so keep that in mind.  I'll go ahead and link to my blog posts or reviews where available if you want to revisit them.

My Life in Books 2010.
Answer the following questions using only books read in 2010. Do not repeat your answers.

* If you could go anywhere, where would you go: Planet of the Apes
* Your favorite form of transportation: Leviathan (note, my first car was named Ahab from Moby Dick)
* Your best friend is: Binky the Space Cat (not posted yet, review on Goodreads)
* You and your friends are: Packing for Mars
* What’s the weather like: Murder on Ice
* Favorite time of day: Night
* If your life was a: Fluke by Christopher Moore (sorry, no review or post, it was a great book though!)
* What is life to you: A History of Ghosts
* Your fear: (Not) Keeping Up With Our Parents
* What is the best advice you have to give: Everybody Marries the Wrong Person
* Thought for the Day: I Know I am But What Are You?
* How I would like to die: Smoke and Mirrors (note: there are a lot of posts for this one since it's a short story collection)
* My soul’s present condition: Obscene in the Extreme
_____________________________________

Numbers, they are crunchy 
 Total Read: 136
(These include books I read this year, but did not blog about)

Review Ratings
19 didn't like it
28 didn't like itit was ok
43 didn't like itit was okliked it
32 didn't like itit was okliked itreally liked it
14 didn't like itit was okliked itreally liked itit was amazing (my current rating)
Format
Audio Book: 11
eBook: 2
Print: 123

Source 
ALA 2010: 12
Publisher/Author: 5
Goodreads: 7
Forgotten Bookmarks: 6
Borrowed: 2
Library: 104
Bought: 0, yeah, I spent $0 on books this year...no, I take it back, I spent $5.00 on books this year because I bought a nice copy of The Scarlet Letter.  I just haven't read it this year.

Male to Female Ratio, plus editor for short story collections
Male: 75
Female: 60
Editor: 1

Books in Series, Monographs, and Collections
Series: 28
Monographs: 105
Collections: 3

2010 Favorites (linked to blog where available, otherwise Goodreads*)
Non-fiction: At Home, The Meaning of Wife, The History of White People, and Packing for Mars
Fiction: Fahrenheit 451, Little Women and Werewolves, Elantris*, Firmin, and Planet of the Apes
Series: His Dark Materials, The Hunger Games, Soulless (aka The Parasol Protectorate). Note: series linked by author tag.

11 December 2010

Day 259: Why Did I Get an eReader?

Hello readers,

I have a new toy.  I named it Hawthorne (after Nathaniel Hawthorne).  It's a Nook Wifi + 3G.  It's shiny.  Here look!

this is not MY Nook, image ganked from B&N

But wait, I'm a librarian, eBooks are the death of libraries, why am I buying an eReader instead of decrying them as the death of libraries and books and the publishing industry?!

Uh, probably because I'm more realistic than that.  Ebooks are a good thing.  They are good for literature, for the environment, for the publishing industries, and they have the potential to be good for libraries too.  This is not the end of books, this is just another incarnation.  It gives casual readers and people who don't have the desire to collect books, the ability to obtain them and keep them without cluttering their homes with things they're going to get rid of anyway.  It keeps those books out of the landfill when they fall apart or when bookstores can't get rid of them and libraries don't want them (as donations; that's right, libraries don't want your ratty copy of The Cat Who Wrote a Blogpost).  It allows people to buy more books at cheaper rates because they don't have to pay for shipping and handling or the cost of actually having the book printed and packaged.

People will still buy physical books.  They will.  There are benefits to owning physical books that cannot be replaced by eReaders.  Books can be lent and borrowed.  Books can be sold.  If you buy an eBook, you do not have the opportunity to get even some of your money back when you dispose of it; you have simply bought the data, it has no value once you "own" it.  I put own in quotations, because that data can and has been revoked by eBook companies.  You are simply purchasing access to that data, and do not have the guarantee of keeping it.  If the data gets corrupted, you lose it just as surely as dropping a book in a bathtub... only less so because most novels are still readable, however ugly, when they've been exposed to water. 

So now that that's out of the way, why did I personally want to obtain an eReader?

They are the future, and I'm willing to embrace them.  They are insanely convenient, and there is an amazing amount of free material available that is much more pleasant to read via eReader than on a laptop or computer screen.  A lot of publishers are moving towards eBooks for galleys and this is a way for me to continue to obtain advanced reader copies.  It is necessary for my professional development as a blogger and as a librarian to use the latest technology for reading and accessing information.  Will it replace me using the library for the bulk of my reading material?  No way in hell.  I obtained the reader, I'm not going to go crazy buying books online I'm going to read once, even at the bargain price of $10.

That's right, I'm using it solely to access free materials, at least at the moment.  When I have money to spend, I may be more likely to purchase books that are harder to find or that I want to keep as reference material.  Many libraries also offer access to eBooks through Overdrive and other media lending services.  The collections aren't large yet, but as more people purchase eReaders, iPads, and similar materials, they will be more likely to provide a wider selection.  Ebooks won't replace regular library collections, but I can easily see them supplementing them, both by expanding the collection and reducing wear and tear on physical copies.  If you have more people reading the eBook, that's fewer people covering copies of Twilight in glitter.  Borrowing books from Overdrive and buying from places other than Amazon is probably the number one reason I did not buy a Kindle.  Kindle is proprietary so they don't allow other eFormats on their reader.  This is bullshit, and Amazon needs to get over themselves. 

Why did I choose the Nook 3G?

After looking at a few eReaders I decided the Nook 3G was the way to go.  If there aren't any wireless networks available, it hooks up with the AT&T 3G network free of charge.  For an extra $50 one-time fee, this seemed worth it to me.  I also liked the wireless download.  It means if I somehow get stuck in a place without computer access, I will not be stuck without a book to read.  There are enough free wireless connections out there to hook up to that it's pretty much guaranteed I will have a library at my fingertips wherever I go.

I didn't go for the color, because to me that defeats the purpose.  It uses an LED screen, which is just harder on the eyes.  It has more functionality, but I don't really need more distraction from my reading than I already have.  I like that the Nook does have a small touch screen at the bottom where I can quick view covers of books.  It's a bit finicky, but once you get used to it it's no more difficult to use than an iPhone or a touchscreen ATM.  In fact, the keyboard is surprisingly easy to use, if a bit laggish.  The touchscreen also functions as a page turner when it goes dark, so that you can "flick" pages rather than using the arrow keys on the side.

The Nook has the benefit of having a Notes and Highlight feature that I can access at any time while I'm in the book.  It works right there on the page.  I do wish it had a separate notes section for making general notes to myself (like keeping a running to-read list to plop on Goodreads, but since I can access Goodreads anyway, not as big of a problem).  The only downside is that I can only highlight and notate books or documents that I own, but what the hell, I usually have a notebook on me anyway.

Physically I like that the Nook has a rubber back and fits well in my hand.  I have surprisingly tiny hands for someone of my size (5'8, 220lbs, yes I'm a fatty).  The rubber back makes it less likely for the otherwise slick eReader to jump out of my hands, and does pretty well at replacing the texture of holding a book, although much slimmer.  And omg, accessories.  You can change the appearance of your Nook by buying all sorts of different frames, backs, covers, and carriers.  At some point, I will at least buy a protective cover for my Nook, so if someone still needs to buy me a Christmas/birthday gift... there you go. I also really like how much cordage they saved by combining the USB and AC adaptors.  Here, check it out, it's pretty.  Oh yeah, and I can choose my own background and screensaver, that's kinda awesome.

Then there's also the expandability of the Nook.  I can apparently add up to 16GB via the internal SD slot.  This is insane given that the 1.5GB it comes with (not including the .5ish the software takes up) can supposedly hold up to 1500 books.  Granted, I can also use it as a music player or audiobook player and it DOES have external speakers on top of having a headphone port.  I haven't tested how good the sound is from the external speakers, but I like the idea of being able to bring text and audiobooks with me on roadtrips.  In fact, I should probably borrow a couple from the library to put on there.  Note: I always delete them when I'm finished, so go away Copyright hounds.

Finally, the last reason I decided to go for the Nook: in store service.  I don't have a B&N close by, but I like knowing that if something goes wrong with it, I can drive the 15-20 minutes and have someone take a look at it.  Ideally they'll be able to fix it while I'm in store and I can enjoy some coffee and sit around reading, but I have no problems going back to a bookstore.  If I bought a Kindle I'd probably have to send it off, even for a relatively minor problem or deal with customer service over the phone.  If I'm going to be made to feel stupid because I forgot to plug it in or because I hit the wrong button, I at least want to opportunity to be laughed at in front of my face.  And if I'm in the store I can read any eBook I want for an hour a day free... plus they give me coupons for coffee.  Speaking of, there's still some left in my pot and I need to get back to my reading.



This is not a paid advertisement.  Barnes and Noble has not offered me any compensation to promote their product.  I have had said product since the 4th as an early Christmas present (thank you, Danny!), and my opinion of it may change over time.  At the moment I am thrilled and happy with my gift.  Dear B&N, if you would like to compensate me in anyway for the positive press... gift card?

Final word:  I still like physical books better and this will not prevent me from carrying around a novel everywhere I go, it will just mean I pack fewer when I go on roadtrips and will never again fear having nothing to read.

01 July 2010

Day 96: ALA 2010 Report

Oh my goodness, what a world wind adventure that was!  I would do the ALA conference again in a heartbeat.  I also want to welcome any new potential readers who had my business cards foisted upon them.  I hope you've had a chance to read through the archives here and there.  I hope you'll continue to read this project.

I have so many books added to my list from publisher catalogs, reader advisory meetings, the Best Of sessions, and best of all: freebies!  I think I did really well on grabbing free books considering it was my first ALA, so go me.  I'm not going to bother listing everything I nabbed here in the blog post, but if you're curious, go to my Goodreads account and click on the ALA-2010 tag (or click here).  At the moment I don't have the ARCs and freebies that I grabbed on the list because that would involve unpacking and repacking my suitcase.  But I will end up having about 200 books to-read and/or To Read.*  The only thing that could make this better is if someone magically paid my way to go to BEA next year.

I want to tell you about everything I did, but I get the feeling you don't read my blog for my personal experiences so much as my thoughts and reflections, so I'll just tell you a couple of the highlights.

Speakers I went to included the fabulous and amazing Toni Morrison; Nancy Pearl's tear jerking interview with Mary McDonagh, who is writing about and filming and documentary about To Kill a Mockingbird; Dave Isay talked about Story Corps, which made my nerdy historian heart beat a little faster.  Sadly I missed Sir Salman Rushdie in favor of going to a session on the future of book reviewing.  This made me sad because the session couldn't have possibly been as good as Rushdie, and I had read articles regarding book reviewing that pretty much said the same thing as the guest panel.  Sad face.  I was trying to be a good blogger, and this is what it got me.

I went to quite a few different Book sessions about upcoming stuff that deserves Some Attention.  Topics included a nomination process for YALSA's Best of Young Adult Fiction (I was fascinated by the process and how they talked about the books), the Best of University Press (it was taped by CSPAN, so I might've shown up on TV!), and editors'/publishers' favorite upcoming books (hosted by Nancy Pearl.

Speaking of Nancy Pearl, it seems like I couldn't get away from the woman at the conference.  Not that she is a person anyone would want to get away from.  She is seriously the nicest person I have ever met and ever so deserving to become an action figure.  She also happened to show up at the Unshelved booth while I was there, so I got my picture taken with Gene Ambaum, Bill Barnes, AND Nancy Pearl.  It totally made my conference, here's the picture:

From A Librarian's Life in Books


I have to admit, we are incredibly adorable in this picture, all of us.  And this came at a point where I very much needed a boost in energy...  Shortly after that I also got my picture taken with a Storm Trooper, a very short Darth Maul, Empire officers, and other Empire bads.  This was taken with someone else's camera and he said he'd let me know when it's ready.  I went total fan-girl...it was slightly embarassing...there may have been a little bit of Derp-ing going on.  Yeah, not even I knew I was that big of a geek until that moment, and I could.not.stop.myself.

There was some good eating when I was able to escape the programming early enough in the evening.  I went to a Dim Sum place called Ping Pong, there was the Korean place Mandu's, and uh, an Indian restaurant in Chinatown that I was too damned tired to remember the name of.

Also...I joined Twitter.  Finally.  It's all Gene Ambaum's fault when he said he was going to Tweet our photo and he linked to my blog!  See!  Librarians=awesome.  Anyway, I'm @libs_lib.  Get it?  I'm a librarian's librarian, but it's also Lib(rarian')s L(ife) I(n) B(ooks).  Shut up, I'm clever.  Now to get back to recovering and normally blog posty things.



*As in actual copies of the books.

11 June 2010

Day 76: something else

How Penguin Classics Ruined Classics By Trying to be Trendy, and other horrors of the publishing world.

I've mentioned horrible book covers before, namely Nick Harkaway's The Gone-Away World, but there was at least an excuse for that one.  That was the first edition of that particularly horrendously covered book.  Sadly, I saw new-old atrocities staring at me from the shelves of a recent and all-to-rare excursion to Borders.

Readers, I give you the new renditions of:
A Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne as ruined by Penguin Classics

They've had the same author do Pride and Prejudice as well as Wuthering Heights.  For some reason, the latter two covers do not bother me nearly as badly as The Scarlet Letter's redo.  It seems that more muted colors were used, for one thing.  I guess since Hester Prynne was a seamstress maybe Mr. Ruben Toledo (or perhaps I should say Mr. Mrs. Isabel Toledo) decided that this cover should just be fabulous to capture Prynne's creative spark.

Somehow I doubt he realized how uptight the Puritans were.  I mean, just look at those slutty bare arms and that wild loose hair; if that's not just begging to be burned at the stake, I don't know what is.  I think maybe I'm angry because I actually really love this book.  I would gladly chop up and burn every single piece and part of the Custom's House chapter, but I remember devouring the rest of this book upstairs in my maternal grandparents' computer room between 8th and 9th grade.  There is such beautiful and complex imagery in this novel, but this cover just doesn't fit.  It is a bad suit of clothes on an otherwise insightful, if somewhat morose, person.  Somewhat surprising given Toledo's career a fashion illustrator.  The redone Scarlet Letter gets an F in my grade book.  Hell, if you're going to give it a cover like this, at least provide illustrations to go along with the text.  Kids are going to pick this up thinking there's updated text or something extra and will be angry as hell that's it's the same stupid copy everyone else is reading, but with a fruitier cover.

I guess I shouldn't complain too much.  At least they didn't give them Twilight-inspired covers like they apparently did with Wuthering Heights.  Yeah, I didn't hear about that either until just now.  My room mate pointed it out to me.  Kinda makes you want to vomit a little, doesn't it?  Oh Heathcliff, your skin is so pale that it sparkles like diamonds in the sunlight!  Oh Catherine, your clumsiness and stalkerish qualities are so endearing!  Doesn't sound too bad, you say?  Here, have a little vomit-inducing literary graphic-ature:

HarperCollins apparently did two of these barf-books, but since I can't find the other one on their site I'll just post the one.  You people are clever and can do your own image searches and all.  Sadly, this particular campaign seems to have actually worked, and although you can't see it in this particular image there are medals on the books that say "Edward and Bella's favorite book."  Wow.  Oh, and you Austen-ites will be happy to know that they gave the same treatment to Pride and Prejudice.  "Beautifully presented for a modern teen audience" indeed.

I'm all for modern covers on classics, but this is just ridiculous.  I mean, honestly, the Twilight-themed covers are only pathetic because they're riding on another trend and have very little to do with Meyer's "writing."  If fucking Pride and Prejudice can't stand on it's own and needs a new cover to move some copies, then maybe it shouldn't be considered a classic anymore.

Readers, what do you think?  Other-book-themed covers a good idea?  What about inappropriately cheerful and/or non-content related covers (geometric designs excluded of course)?  Are you totally pissed that I wrote an entire blog post about nothing but covers?  Because I'm not.  I think this shit is both hilarious and infuriating at the same time.  It certainly doesn't say anything positive about our buying habits if they assume that this ploy will actually work (it definitely doesn't say much when it already has worked.  For the love of god you can get used copies of classics for 50 cents).

08 June 2010

Book Blogger Appreciation

Greetings blog readers, I'm posting this as part of my self-nomination for the Book Bloggers Appreciation Week Award.  Don't worry, you'll get your regular daily post.  In the meantime I'm offering five of what I consider to be the quality Grade A posts of this blog.  For the benefit of potential new readers and the judges I will also include a description of the project.

A Librarian's Life in Books is a unique blog that uses plot, characters, subtext, themes, and brief moments or quotes to reflect on and analyze my life, profession, past, future, relationships, and my ideas.  I know this does not fit in with regular book blogs, but I feel that my blog offers something new to readers.  It allows them to look at books and their lives in a different light, and hopefully it will lead to deeper reflection and better reading, regardless of the material.

Without further muddling about, here's what I consider to be some of my best posts:

Day 25: My Freshman Year
Day 46: The Meaning of Wife
Day 51: The Stranger
Day 57: The Atlantis Code
Day 60: The Gone-Away World
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...