The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter. ISBN: 9780393049343.
Okay, well, if I didn't get my ass handed to me for my last post, this one is really going to do it. If you didn't guess by now, I'm kind of liberal. I actually consider myself a moderate liberal, and I probably have some sort of conservative ideas about certain things. One of those certain things happens to be...guns.
In History of White People, Painter talks about the practice of Ancient Germans carrying weapons everywhere as a symbol of their coming of age and their citizenship. I like this idea. I think they should teach this in school. Oh yes, what could be worse than giving a 16 year old a deadly weapon? Well, it's no worse than giving them a one ton blunt object on wheels. I do not think we should hand out weapons to everyone when they turn 18. I do think we should teach them how to use them, proper care and handling of basic firearms. If it is our right to bare arms as citizens, then as citizens doesn't it make sense to make it a mandatory part of citizenship?
Here's my reasoning: enough people own guns and it is so easy to fatally wound yourself by accident that for our safety and the safety of others we need this kind of instruction. You may not be comfortable carrying a gun, or being around them. I know I'm not, but I believe most of that has to do with the fact that I am so incredibly terrified of guns because I don't know how exactly how they function, etc. In fact, I flunked my first driver's test because the cop's hand gun was the only thing I could think of.
We are, of course, taught to fear what we don't understand, especially if we know it's dangerous. With training we would be more confident and less fearful around guns. In a time when certain people can smuggle explosives in their underwear, but can't get a quart of breast milk for their babies onto planes, it might be nice to have a population that knows how to handle weaponry. If there's an air marshal on the plane who gets taken out, maybe a terrorist or potential terrorist will think twice if they know the entire plane load of passengers is likely to pick up that gun and eliminate the threat. Yeah, it's a little extreme, but I am firmly on the side of an educated and well skilled populace over one where ignorance might get them killed.
Plus, we would be pretty much set for the zombapocalypse.
Hypothesis: In every book, whether novel, non-fiction, or downright fluff, there is something to enrich the lives of the reader if they are willing to dig deep enough in their own minds and think about what they are reading.
Showing posts with label nell irvin painter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nell irvin painter. Show all posts
20 May 2010
19 May 2010
Day 53: The History of White People
The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter. ISBN: 9780393049343.
Author Note: I was going to try to avoid talking about race, but the very nature of this book sort of prevents it. I will attempt to tread carefully, I will try not to step on toes, but even on a good day I am not the most diplomatic of speakers.
Oh man, reading this has really taken me back. Painter's work parallels what I was writing about in my senior project. Granted, her work has much more in-depth scholarship and covers a much broader range of people. Despite its 400 pages, I have practically devoured this book because it's a topic that still interests me. And this book definitely makes me want to pick up my research again and work on my flimsy 35-page project.
For those of you who wonder what the hell I'm talking about, my senior project was about perceptions of German immigrants and German Americans by native-born Americans during the Civil War, World War I, and World War II. I compared this with perceptions during times of peace, and a lot of that involved discussions of whiteness. I cannot tell you how important something like this book is, not only to my research, but to the understanding of racial identity in America. Period.
In some ways, racial identity might as well not even exist. I am not saying that it hasn't influenced people (individually and as a group); I am saying that it is a social construct and for the most part any differences we actually have are cultural and socioeconomic. Painter states this as well: "No consensus has ever formed on the number of human races or even on the number of white races. Criteria constantly shift according to individual taste and political need." (Page 383). On the other hand, I also understand that I'm coming from a place of privilege. I understand that for billions of people, race does exist, because it has given them benefits or disadvantages. The thing is, over the past 100 years the American definition of what a "good" immigrant (or ethnic) is has changed drastically. As we include more racial groups and as racial lines continue to blur together, I think that race will eventually matter less and less. To again quote Painter: "Acknowledgment of the existence of people of 'mixed race,' as in the U.S. Census, means acknowledgment of the impermanence of race." (Page 396).
I think in some ways this intermixing will lead to a better human species. It is easier to accept what you are familiar with. If we can see each other in the faces of our enemies, it will be one less thing we are likely to fight over. I am concerned about the potential loss of culture, but I think we will find new ways to differentiate ourselves from our neighbors, and perhaps not so much as to start the warmongering all over again.
**I am extremely uncomfortable talking about race given my privileged background and education. I have tried to be delicate and not wrong-headed, but if I've said anything wrong-headed it was meant to evoke discussion and not flare up hard feelings. Like everyone else, I have prejudices; I hate that I have prejudices, and I am working on not letting those prejudices negatively affect my life or the lives of others. If I have said anything completely fucked up, please let me know (preferably politely). I am a work in progress.
Author Note: I was going to try to avoid talking about race, but the very nature of this book sort of prevents it. I will attempt to tread carefully, I will try not to step on toes, but even on a good day I am not the most diplomatic of speakers.
Oh man, reading this has really taken me back. Painter's work parallels what I was writing about in my senior project. Granted, her work has much more in-depth scholarship and covers a much broader range of people. Despite its 400 pages, I have practically devoured this book because it's a topic that still interests me. And this book definitely makes me want to pick up my research again and work on my flimsy 35-page project.
For those of you who wonder what the hell I'm talking about, my senior project was about perceptions of German immigrants and German Americans by native-born Americans during the Civil War, World War I, and World War II. I compared this with perceptions during times of peace, and a lot of that involved discussions of whiteness. I cannot tell you how important something like this book is, not only to my research, but to the understanding of racial identity in America. Period.
In some ways, racial identity might as well not even exist. I am not saying that it hasn't influenced people (individually and as a group); I am saying that it is a social construct and for the most part any differences we actually have are cultural and socioeconomic. Painter states this as well: "No consensus has ever formed on the number of human races or even on the number of white races. Criteria constantly shift according to individual taste and political need." (Page 383). On the other hand, I also understand that I'm coming from a place of privilege. I understand that for billions of people, race does exist, because it has given them benefits or disadvantages. The thing is, over the past 100 years the American definition of what a "good" immigrant (or ethnic) is has changed drastically. As we include more racial groups and as racial lines continue to blur together, I think that race will eventually matter less and less. To again quote Painter: "Acknowledgment of the existence of people of 'mixed race,' as in the U.S. Census, means acknowledgment of the impermanence of race." (Page 396).
I think in some ways this intermixing will lead to a better human species. It is easier to accept what you are familiar with. If we can see each other in the faces of our enemies, it will be one less thing we are likely to fight over. I am concerned about the potential loss of culture, but I think we will find new ways to differentiate ourselves from our neighbors, and perhaps not so much as to start the warmongering all over again.
**I am extremely uncomfortable talking about race given my privileged background and education. I have tried to be delicate and not wrong-headed, but if I've said anything wrong-headed it was meant to evoke discussion and not flare up hard feelings. Like everyone else, I have prejudices; I hate that I have prejudices, and I am working on not letting those prejudices negatively affect my life or the lives of others. If I have said anything completely fucked up, please let me know (preferably politely). I am a work in progress.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)